{"id":1081,"date":"2026-02-27T11:16:38","date_gmt":"2026-02-27T11:16:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/?p=1081"},"modified":"2026-02-27T11:16:38","modified_gmt":"2026-02-27T11:16:38","slug":"bitwise-cio-matt-hougan-dismisses-jane-street-blame-for-bitcoin-decline","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/2026\/02\/27\/bitwise-cio-matt-hougan-dismisses-jane-street-blame-for-bitcoin-decline\/","title":{"rendered":"Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan Dismisses Jane Street Blame for Bitcoin Decline"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Matt Hougan has rejected claims that trading firm Jane Street is responsible for Bitcoin\u2019s recent drop, describing the downturn as a typical crypto winter rather than a coordinated effort. Writing on X on February 26, the Bitwise Asset Management executive said the pullback reflects normal market cycles, not manipulation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His remarks follow renewed online speculation and legal headlines as Bitcoin trades more than 46 percent below its all time high.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lawsuits and Market Speculation<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Debate intensified after reports that Terraform Labs\u2019 bankruptcy administrator filed a lawsuit against Jane Street in federal court in Manhattan. The complaint alleges the firm used insider knowledge ahead of the May 2022 Terra Luna collapse, including a large TerraUSD withdrawal from Curve\u2019s liquidity pool shortly after Terraform removed significant funds. Jane Street has denied the accusations and attributed the collapse to Terraform\u2019s leadership.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Separately, some analysts such as Bull Theory claimed Jane Street operates a daily selling strategy aimed at pressuring Bitcoin prices. They also referenced an interim order from India\u2019s Securities and Exchange Board concerning alleged index manipulation tied to expiry days. That matter remains under appeal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hougan dismissed these claims, arguing that Bitcoin\u2019s weakness is better explained by investors closing long positions, cutting leverage, and reallocating capital. He also shared analysis from colleague Andr\u00e9 Dragosch, whose data on intraday trading since US spot ETF launches in January 2024 shows more consistent weakness during non US hours rather than at a fixed morning time in New York.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Macro strategist Alex Kr\u00fcger supported Hougan\u2019s view, stating that large trading firms and authorized participants primarily arbitrage price differences between ETFs, futures, and spot markets rather than direct price suppression.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Broader Structural Debate<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The discussion has also revived questions about ETF mechanics. ProCap CIO Jeff Park recently noted that the issue is less about any single firm and more about how authorized participants operate within regulatory frameworks that allow in kind creations and redemptions. Critics argue that hedging ETF exposure through futures instead of buying spot Bitcoin could reduce direct spot demand.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So far, none of the legal actions or regulatory filings have demonstrated coordinated wrongdoing in Bitcoin markets. Still, the presence of major quantitative firms and complex derivatives strategies has fueled suspicion during the downturn.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For Hougan, the explanation remains straightforward. He attributes the pullback to Bitcoin\u2019s typical four year cycle, deleveraging, and shifting investor focus. In his view, the market is simply experiencing a standard winter phase that will eventually give way to recovery.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Matt Hougan has rejected claims that trading firm Jane Street is responsible for Bitcoin\u2019s recent drop, describing the downturn as a typical crypto winter rather than...<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1081","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1081","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1081"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1081\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1083,"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1081\/revisions\/1083"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1081"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1081"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1081"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}