{"id":1439,"date":"2026-03-12T10:27:05","date_gmt":"2026-03-12T10:27:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/?p=1439"},"modified":"2026-03-12T10:27:05","modified_gmt":"2026-03-12T10:27:05","slug":"arthur-hayes-explains-when-he-plans-to-buy-bitcoin-again","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/2026\/03\/12\/arthur-hayes-explains-when-he-plans-to-buy-bitcoin-again\/","title":{"rendered":"Arthur Hayes Explains When He Plans to Buy Bitcoin Again"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Arthur Hayes has said he would wait for central banks to resume large scale money printing before purchasing more Bitcoin, even though he believes the cryptocurrency could eventually climb above 100,000 dollars.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The BitMEX co founder shared his views during a March 10 interview with Natalie Brunell on the CoinStories podcast. Hayes warned that the ongoing conflict involving the United States, Israel, and Iran could trigger a wider sell off in financial markets that might push Bitcoin below 60,000 dollars.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

He explained that if the conflict continues for a prolonged period, equity markets could experience significant selling pressure. In such a scenario, Bitcoin might fall further and potentially break below the 60,000 dollar level as liquidations increase.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hayes pointed out that in previous Middle East conflicts during his lifetime, the Federal Reserve eventually responded by expanding the money supply. For that reason, he believes the key signal for investors is not the conflict itself but how central banks react to it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

He said that if he had only one dollar to invest today, he would hold off on buying Bitcoin for now. According to him, the longer the conflict continues, the more likely it becomes that the Federal Reserve will inject liquidity into the economy to support government spending. He believes that moment would present a better opportunity to buy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

At the same time, Hayes cautioned investors against trying to precisely time the market. He noted that many people rely on the same mainstream news coverage and could easily misinterpret developments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When asked why Bitcoin has struggled to gain strong momentum over the past six to nine months, Hayes attributed the situation to limited liquidity rather than weak demand. He described Bitcoin as a signal for liquidity conditions in the broader financial system.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hayes also dismissed claims that large institutions or trading firms such as Jane Street are deliberately suppressing Bitcoin\u2019s price. He said he does not believe there is any coordinated attempt by market makers to push prices lower.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Instead, he suggested that such accusations often come from investors looking for someone to blame after poorly timed trades. He advised traders without professional setups to avoid using leverage or engaging in short term speculation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Despite his cautious short term outlook, Hayes said he remains heavily invested in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. He added that the need for decentralized forms of money has grown stronger since Bitcoin first appeared in 2009.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His comments come as Bitcoin trades just below 70,000 dollars after several months of relatively sideways movement. While Hayes believes the price could fall toward 60,000 dollars, analyst Markus Thielen argues that Bitcoin\u2019s resilience despite rising oil prices and geopolitical tensions could signal a potential move toward 80,000 dollars.#crypto #cryptonews https:\/\/t.me\/coinsignalpublic<\/a> https:\/\/coinsignals.net<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Arthur Hayes has said he would wait for central banks to resume large scale money printing before purchasing more Bitcoin, even though he believes the cryptocurrency...<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1439","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1439","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1439"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1439\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1441,"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1439\/revisions\/1441"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1439"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1439"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1439"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}