{"id":3241,"date":"2026-05-20T20:54:57","date_gmt":"2026-05-20T20:54:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/?p=3241"},"modified":"2026-05-20T20:54:57","modified_gmt":"2026-05-20T20:54:57","slug":"key-xrp-indicators-point-to-a-bullish-turn-after-weeks-of-selling-pressure","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/2026\/05\/20\/key-xrp-indicators-point-to-a-bullish-turn-after-weeks-of-selling-pressure\/","title":{"rendered":"Key XRP Indicators Point to a Bullish Turn After Weeks of Selling Pressure"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Exchange activity surrounding XRP is beginning to shift after weeks of persistent selling pressure, according to fresh analysis from CryptoQuant.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Recent data from the XRP Multi Exchange Daily Depositing and Withdrawing Transactions Delta revealed that Bybit\u2019s transaction imbalance moved back toward neutral around May 16, ending an extended period of strong deposit activity that had lasted from mid April through mid May.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Exchange Flow Dynamics Begin to Change<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Heavy deposit activity on exchanges is often interpreted as a sign of potential selling pressure because assets transferred onto trading platforms are generally easier to sell or liquidate. The latest data suggests that this pressure may now be easing, at least based on transaction count trends.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While Bybit previously dominated exchange inflows, the pattern has now shifted. Both Binance and Coinbase are currently showing stronger withdrawal activity, with outgoing transactions surpassing deposits on both platforms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This marks a major change compared to the earlier market structure, which was heavily influenced by deposit activity on Bybit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The updated exchange behavior suggests that XRP market flows are rotating rather than continuing the broader deposit driven trend seen over the past month. As Bybit activity cools down, Binance and Coinbase are experiencing increased withdrawal side momentum.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CryptoQuant also clarified that the metric measures transaction delta rather than the total amount of XRP transferred. As a result, it does not indicate the exact volume of tokens entering or leaving exchanges. Even so, analysts consider the directional shift important because it highlights a meaningful change in trading behavior across several major platforms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Technical Indicators Hint at Potential Volatility<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

At the same time, technical signals are beginning to suggest that XRP could soon experience a significant price move.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Crypto analyst Ali Martinez recently noted that XRP\u2019s Bollinger Bands on the three day chart have tightened to their narrowest range in more than a year. This type of setup is often viewed as a precursor to increased market volatility.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

XRP has remained locked within a trading range between 1.29 dollars and 1.50 dollars for several months. Martinez explained that a confirmed breakout above 1.50 dollars could open the door for a rally toward 1.80 dollars, while a breakdown below 1.29 dollars may trigger stronger downside pressure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Institutional Interest Remains Strong<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Despite broader market uncertainty, XRP has continued to attract institutional inflows.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to earlier reports, investment products tied to Bitcoin and Ethereum experienced notable selling pressure recently. However, XRP investment products still managed to record inflows exceeding 67 million dollars last week, demonstrating resilience even during periods of wider market weakness.#crypto#cryptonews https:\/\/coinsignals.net<\/a> https:\/\/t.me\/coinsignalpublic<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Exchange activity surrounding XRP is beginning to shift after weeks of persistent selling pressure, according to fresh analysis from CryptoQuant. Recent data from the XRP Multi...<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3241","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3241","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3241"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3241\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3243,"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3241\/revisions\/3243"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3241"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3241"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3241"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}