{"id":3341,"date":"2026-05-24T21:12:38","date_gmt":"2026-05-24T21:12:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/?p=3341"},"modified":"2026-05-24T21:12:38","modified_gmt":"2026-05-24T21:12:38","slug":"ripple-etfs-continue-attracting-inflows-but-xrp-price-remains-under-pressure","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/2026\/05\/24\/ripple-etfs-continue-attracting-inflows-but-xrp-price-remains-under-pressure\/","title":{"rendered":"Ripple ETFs Continue Attracting Inflows but XRP Price Remains Under Pressure"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The streak without major outflows has now lasted for more than three consecutive weeks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While most exchange traded funds tied to major cryptocurrencies experienced a difficult and volatile week, the funds tracking XRP continued to record positive inflows.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Despite the steady investor interest, however, XRP itself failed to gain strong upward momentum and even dropped to a multi month low before posting a modest rebound today.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ripple ETFs Stand Out Amid Broader Market Weakness<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Spot XRP ETFs recorded net inflows of slightly more than $22 million during the previous business week. This marked the third straight week of positive flows since the streak began in May.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to data from SoSoValue, the last trading session that saw more outflows than inflows for XRP related ETFs was on April 30.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Although the latest $22 million inflow was smaller than some previous weeks, the performance stood out because many crypto related ETFs faced heavy withdrawals during the same period.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As previously reported, spot bitcoin ETFs suffered their worst trading week since late January, with more than $1.25 billion leaving the funds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ethereum ETFs also struggled, recording net outflows of approximately $216 million. While that figure was slightly lower than the previous week\u2019s $255 million in withdrawals, the ETH funds have not recorded a single positive day since May 8.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In contrast, ETFs linked to SOL attracted more than $15.5 million in inflows. Meanwhile, the two funds tracking Hyperliquid\u2019s HYPE token brought in over $72 million as the asset surged to a new all time high above $63.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

XRP Price Struggles Despite Positive ETF Momentum<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Although investor demand for Ripple related ETFs remained strong, XRP\u2019s market price failed to capitalize on the positive sentiment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

After facing rejection near $1.55 last week, XRP quickly turned lower and began the new trading week around $1.42.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The token continued declining alongside the broader crypto market before plunging below $1.30 yesterday.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That drop pushed XRP to its lowest price level in more than six weeks and represented a decline of roughly 15 percent from the rally peak near $1.55 recorded on May 17.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Over the past 24 hours, XRP has managed to recover slightly and is now trading close to $1.35. The rebound appears to have been supported by improving sentiment surrounding recent developments in the conflict between the United States and Iran.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, crypto analyst Ali Martinez warned that XRP has broken below the rising support line of a symmetrical triangle pattern on the daily chart.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Martinez, failure to reclaim the $1.40 level in the near term could trigger another sharp decline, potentially sending the token down toward $1.14.#crypto#cryptonews https:\/\/coinsignals.net<\/a> https:\/\/t.me\/coinsignalpublic<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The streak without major outflows has now lasted for more than three consecutive weeks. While most exchange traded funds tied to major cryptocurrencies experienced a difficult...<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3341","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3341","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3341"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3341\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3343,"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3341\/revisions\/3343"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3341"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3341"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3341"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}