{"id":4943,"date":"2026-07-25T21:23:47","date_gmt":"2026-07-25T21:23:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/?p=4943"},"modified":"2026-07-25T21:23:47","modified_gmt":"2026-07-25T21:23:47","slug":"ethereum-bear-market-may-have-reached-its-bottom-as-analyst-targets-7k","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/2026\/07\/25\/ethereum-bear-market-may-have-reached-its-bottom-as-analyst-targets-7k\/","title":{"rendered":"Ethereum Bear Market May Have Reached Its Bottom as Analyst Targets $7k"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<figure class=\"wp-block-gallery has-nested-images columns-default is-cropped wp-block-gallery-1 is-layout-flex wp-block-gallery-is-layout-flex\">\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"588\" height=\"330\" data-id=\"4944\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/IMG_3387-7.jpeg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-4944\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/IMG_3387-7.jpeg 588w, https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/IMG_3387-7-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/IMG_3387-7-520x292.jpeg 520w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 588px) 100vw, 588px\" \/><\/figure>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Some market watchers still believe a move toward $2,000 could be nothing more than a bull trap before Ethereum experiences one last decline.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Pseudonymous crypto analyst NoName believes Ethereum has entered the price range where previous bear markets have historically found their bottom. According to the trader, a sequence of four consecutive lower highs suggests the prolonged downtrend may finally be ending.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Despite the prevailing bearish sentiment, NoName has continued accumulating ETH during the downturn, maintaining a long term price target of $7,000. The analyst argues that the same market psychology that fuelled enthusiasm when Ethereum traded near $4,900 is now driving excessive pessimism below $2,000, even though the network itself has seen no fundamental deterioration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Analyst Identifies Historical Bottom Zone<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In a post published on Friday, NoName highlighted Ethereum\u2019s steady decline through four lower peaks, beginning at $4,957, followed by $3,400, then $2,460, and most recently $1,950. The trader described this as a classic bearish structure, noting that the pattern has pushed ETH into the $1,300 to $1,900 range, which has historically served as a market floor.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Rather than relying solely on technical analysis, NoName emphasised investor psychology. The analyst pointed out that Ethereum was widely celebrated at nearly $5,000, yet many now dismiss it as a failed project below $2,000 despite little changing fundamentally. According to NoName, such extreme pessimism often appears near major market bottoms, although any recovery is likely to be gradual and volatile.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Additional bullish indicators emerged the same day. Analyst Ali Martinez highlighted a positive crossover between Ethereum\u2019s MVRV ratio and its 160 day moving average, a signal that has preceded several significant recoveries by indicating the end of distribution phases.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Meanwhile, Arab Chain reported that Ethereum\u2019s 30 day average funding rate on Binance climbed to approximately 0.00339, its highest level in six months, while ETH traded around $1,920. The increase points to improving market sentiment, although funding rates remain below levels that have previously signalled overheated conditions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>At the time of writing, CoinGecko data showed Ethereum trading just under $1,900. The cryptocurrency has gained nearly 12% over the past month but remains about 62% below its all time high of $4,946 reached last August. After retreating from a seven week high near $1,950 earlier in the week, ETH must reclaim the $2,000 level to strengthen bullish momentum.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Not All Analysts Agree<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CryptoQuant offered a more cautious assessment on Thursday. While Ethereum was trading roughly 17% below its realised price, the analytics platform noted that only two of its five historical bottom indicators had reached extreme levels. According to the firm, a full capitulation event has yet to occur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Even so, large investors have continued accumulating ETH. Blockchain tracker Lookonchain identified a wallet that acquired 27,000 ETH valued at approximately $52 million through Galaxy Digital\u2019s OTC desk. Meanwhile, BitMEX co founder Arthur Hayes purchased another 644 ETH, increasing his total acquisitions over the previous eight days to 3,270 ETH.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Institutional demand has also remained strong. Spot Ethereum ETFs have attracted more than $408 million in inflows this month, while prediction market participants on Kalshi currently expect ETH to reach around $3,200 before the end of the year.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>However, not every analyst shares NoName\u2019s outlook. Market analyst Nonzee expects Ethereum to rally toward $2,000, or even $2,200 if Bitcoin climbs to $70,000, but believes that move would represent a bull trap rather than the start of a sustained breakout. The analyst still expects ETH to fall into the $900 to $1,300 range before beginning a longer term recovery. Even so, Nonzee\u2019s ultimate price target also stands at $7,000.#crypto#cryptonews <a href=\"https:\/\/coinsignals.net\">https:\/\/coinsignals.net<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.me\/coinsignalpublic\">https:\/\/t.me\/coinsignalpublic<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Some market watchers still believe a move toward $2,000 could be nothing more than a bull trap before Ethereum experiences one last decline. Pseudonymous crypto analyst&#46;&#46;&#46;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4943","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4943","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4943"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4943\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4945,"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4943\/revisions\/4945"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4943"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4943"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4943"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}