{"id":948,"date":"2026-02-22T13:39:37","date_gmt":"2026-02-22T13:39:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/?p=948"},"modified":"2026-02-22T13:39:37","modified_gmt":"2026-02-22T13:39:37","slug":"ripple-etf-demand-has-faded-as-xrp-price-drops-11-percent-in-a-week","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/2026\/02\/22\/ripple-etf-demand-has-faded-as-xrp-price-drops-11-percent-in-a-week\/","title":{"rendered":"Ripple ETF Demand Has Faded as XRP Price Drops 11 Percent in a Week"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

It has been more than three months since the first XRP ETF launched, yet investor demand appears to have largely disappeared. Over the past week, the ETFs tracking XRP have attracted minimal net inflows, highlighting waning interest. Meanwhile, the underlying token has struggled to sustain the short-lived price gains from the previous week and now trades over 10 percent lower.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Declining Interest in Ripple ETFs<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

When Canary Capital\u2019s XRPC product debuted on November 13, 2025, it was met with strong investor enthusiasm, breaking the record for single-day trading volume for a new XRP ETF. Shortly afterward, four additional funds tracking the altcoin launched, and total inflows rapidly climbed past one billion dollars. However, that momentum has since stagnated, with several weeks recording net outflows rather than gains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For instance, in the week ending January 23, investors withdrew 40.64 million dollars, followed by another 52.26 million dollars in the subsequent week. There was a brief positive period with 39.04 million dollars in net inflows, but since then, investor interest has largely vanished. On February 11, ETF activity reported no daily flows at all, with SoSoValue registering a clear \u201c0.00 dollars\u201d for the first time since the products were introduced. The following week, this lack of activity continued: February 17 and February 20 saw no flows, while February 18 recorded 2.21 million dollars in net outflows and February 19 only 4.05 million dollars in net inflows.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

With Monday being a national holiday in the United States, half of the business days had no trading activity to report. As a result, cumulative net inflows have remained flat at approximately 1.23 billion dollars, demonstrating that ETF demand for XRP has largely disappeared despite the early excitement surrounding the products.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

XRP Price Pullback<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last weekend, Ripple\u2019s native token experienced a brief surge, reaching over 1.65 dollars and marking a multi-week peak even though ETFs showed minimal activity. This rally was short-lived, as XRP quickly lost momentum and returned to around 1.40 dollars mid-week, dipping below that level on several occasions. At the time of reporting, the token has managed to hold support near this range but is still down more than 10 percent over the week.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Investor behavior continues to be shaped by ETF inactivity and a market dominated by short traders, according to popular analyst CW. However, a recent report from Santiment suggests that XRP may currently be slightly undervalued based on the 30-day MVRV ratio. Additionally, the significant realized losses across the market could potentially set the stage for a notable price rebound. Historical trends indicate that similar periods of concentrated losses have preceded strong recoveries, including a 114 percent surge in 2022 under comparable conditions.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

It has been more than three months since the first XRP ETF launched, yet investor demand appears to have largely disappeared. Over the past week, the...<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-948","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/948","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=948"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/948\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":950,"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/948\/revisions\/950"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=948"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=948"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.coinsignals.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=948"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}