CoinSignals

Debate surrounding Bitcoin’s proposed BIP 110 soft fork is growing more intense, as critics warn the upgrade could create major wallet compatibility issues and potentially leave some users with permanently inaccessible funds.

The concerns were raised by Farside Investors, which challenged statements made by BIP 110 supporter Fred Krueger in a June 28 post on X.

Concerns Over Wallet Compatibility and Frozen Funds

Krueger argued that BIP 110 would not alter Bitcoin’s core monetary principles. According to him, the 21 million coin supply, proof of work system, Lightning Network, multisignature wallets, self custody, and address functionality would all remain unchanged.

He stated that the main effect of the proposal would be to invalidate large arbitrary data used by protocols such as Ordinals and Runes.

However, Farside strongly disagreed with that view.

The firm argued that BIP 110 would ban several Taproot scripting features, including the OP_IF opcode used in Miniscript. This creates a serious concern for wallets that currently support Miniscript.

According to Farside, even after the fork is activated, some wallets may continue generating addresses based on scripts that would no longer be valid under the new rules.

As a result, users could unknowingly send Bitcoin to addresses that appear valid but become impossible to spend from after activation. In such cases, funds sent to those addresses could effectively become permanently locked.

Adding to the concern, Farside noted that even the latest version of Bitcoin Knots, one of the node implementations supporting BIP 110, may itself generate incompatible addresses.

The firm also highlighted another issue involving pay to public key outputs, commonly known as P2PK.

This script type was widely used in Bitcoin’s early years and still holds more than 1.7 million BTC. Under BIP 110, the creation of new P2PK outputs would be prohibited, although spending existing ones would remain allowed.

Farside warned that despite safeguards such as grandfathering older outputs and limiting enforcement to roughly one year, the proposal could still temporarily freeze funds or expose users to theft risks under certain conditions.

BIP 110 could become active if 55% of miners signal support during a difficulty adjustment period. If that threshold is not reached, activation could still occur through a mandatory signaling mechanism starting at block 961,632, which is expected in August 2026.

Broader Debate Over Bitcoin Network Usage

The controversy around BIP 110 extends beyond wallet compatibility and touches on a larger debate over Bitcoin network congestion.

Supporters such as Krueger argue that inscriptions, BRC 20 tokens, and similar use cases have added unnecessary congestion to the network. They believe BIP 110 offers a way to reduce this activity without changing Bitcoin’s monetary foundation.

Critics reject that argument.

The Block Runner Podcast account argued that the 126.7 million inscriptions on Bitcoin represent only 1.267 BTC in value, describing the amount as negligible relative to the overall network.

They also pointed out that miners are benefiting financially from this activity. Mining groups such as AntPool, ViaBTC, SpiderPool, F2Pool, and Luxor are reportedly earning fees from these transactions, helping offset Bitcoin’s declining security budget.

At the same time, BIP 110 appears to have limited support among both miners and node operators.

Meanwhile, network activity remains strong despite market weakness. Recent data from CryptoQuant shows Bitcoin network usage remains near record levels even as BTC trades below $60,000, suggesting demand for blockspace remains strong regardless of the ongoing debate.#crypto#cryptonews https://coinsignals.net https://t.me/coinsignalpublic

Trading in tokenized pre IPO perpetual contracts saw explosive growth in May 2026, according to a new report from CoinGecko.

Monthly trading volume surged by 1,059%, rising from $60.51 million in April to $701.44 million in May. This sharp increase followed several months of relatively weak market activity and signals growing investor interest in tokenized pre IPO assets.

SpaceX Drives Market Momentum

SpaceX emerged as the clear leader in the market, recording $305 million in monthly trading volume. That represented 43.5% of all tokenized pre IPO perpetual trading activity in May.

Strong interest in SpaceX contracts intensified ahead of the company’s highly anticipated Nasdaq listing on June 12.

Artificial intelligence giants OpenAI and Anthropic ranked second and third in trading activity.

Combined, contracts linked to SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic accounted for more than 95% of all tokenized pre IPO perpetual trading volume during the month, showing that market activity was heavily concentrated in a small number of high profile assets.

SpaceX contract prices also varied significantly across major exchanges before the listing but gradually aligned as more IPO related information became available.

During the week leading up to the debut, SpaceX perpetual contracts traded near $170 on exchanges such as Binance and WEEX.

Meanwhile, Coinbase, Gate, and OKX priced the contracts lower at approximately $155.

As additional IPO details became public, prices across exchanges gradually converged into the $160 to $165 range by June 10.

In the final two days before listing, prices moved higher together and climbed above $180. On June 12, fresh information about the expected listing price triggered significant volatility in pre IPO markets.

Despite sharp swings, SpaceX tokenized contracts eventually closed at an average price of $157, around 4.67% above the stock’s opening price of $150.

Traditional Finance Products Gain Ground on Crypto Exchanges

Beyond SpaceX, crypto exchanges are rapidly expanding access to tokenized real world assets and traditional finance linked products.

Since the beginning of 2025, MEXC has listed the largest number of real world asset products, adding 358 total listings. These included 199 spot assets and 159 traditional finance perpetual contracts.

Gate ranked second with 224 RWA products, including 146 perpetual contracts and 78 spot listings.

WEEX came third with 192 listings, made up of 84 spot assets and 108 perpetual offerings.

Several major exchanges, including HTX, Binance, Crypto.com, Coinbase, and OKX, have focused more heavily on traditional finance perpetual contracts rather than spot real world asset listings.

CoinGecko found that each of these exchanges added only one or two spot RWA listings over the past 17 months.

Overall, exchanges averaged 75 perpetual contract listings compared with 37 spot RWA listings, highlighting stronger demand for perpetual products tied to real world and traditional financial assets.#crypto#cryptonews https://coinsignals.net https://t.me/coinsignalpublic

The European Union’s transition period under the Markets in Crypto Assets regulation, known as MiCA, officially ends on July 1, 2026. From that date forward, any crypto company operating in the EU without a valid MiCA license will be considered non compliant and in violation of regulatory requirements.

The deadline marks a major turning point for Europe’s crypto industry, with many firms now facing difficult decisions about licensing, restructuring, or exiting the region entirely.

MiCA Raises Pressure on Crypto Firms

European Securities and Markets Authority has instructed all unauthorized digital asset providers to stop operations before the end of the transition period.

Under MiCA, crypto firms must secure authorization from a national regulator in order to continue serving customers within the European Union.

Before MiCA, Europe was home to more than 3,000 legitimate virtual asset providers. However, the new regulatory framework is expected to significantly reduce that number.

Several major exchanges have already adjusted their European operations. Binance announced that it would suspend parts of its EU services after failing to secure a MiCA license.

Former Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao stated in an interview with The Block that the company’s license application in Greece had reportedly met compliance requirements and was close to approval before being withdrawn.

Journalist Gareth Jenkinson also claimed that sources suggested Christine Lagarde may have influenced Greek authorities against approving the permit.

Binance is now pursuing licensing approvals in other EU markets, including France, Ireland, and Latvia.

Many Firms May Exit the EU Market

According to OKX Europe CEO Erald Ghoos, as much as 80% of crypto firms may fail to survive under MiCA and could be forced out of the European market.

This view is supported by growing relocation interest. Dubai based lawyer Irina Heaver noted a sharp rise in inquiries from European crypto founders considering a move to the United Arab Emirates.

One major reason is speed. In the UAE, licensing through the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority can reportedly be completed within days rather than months.

For consumers, ESMA has issued a warning to exercise caution. Investors are advised to confirm whether their crypto provider appears on the official MiCA register and verify which legal entity is responsible for holding their assets.

Regulators also recommend that users consider moving funds away from unauthorized platforms after July 1, as these services may offer weaker legal protections and greater risk of losing access to customer assets.

Regulation Also Creates New Opportunities

Despite concerns about an industry exodus, not all signals point to negative outcomes.

Some crypto firms are already benefiting from greater regulatory clarity.

Konstantins Vasilenko, co founder and CBDO of Paybis, said MiCA is helping attract larger institutional investors who require strong regulatory certainty before deploying capital.

According to Vasilenko, Paybis secured both MiCA and PSD2 licenses in Latvia in May. Since then, the company’s EU trading volume has increased by 70% quarter over quarter, even though transaction counts have remained relatively stable.

This suggests that while MiCA may force many smaller firms out of the market, it could also strengthen confidence and encourage larger institutional participation in Europe’s crypto sector.#crypto#cryptonews https://coinsignals.net https://t.me/coinsignalpublic

The Japanese yen has dropped to its weakest level against the US dollar since 1986, sparking fresh debate about how currency weakness could impact crypto markets.

The sharp decline has raised two key questions for investors. A weaker yen could push more capital toward digital assets as people seek protection from currency depreciation. At the same time, any surprise intervention by Japanese authorities could trigger short term volatility across risk assets, including cryptocurrencies.

Crypto Markets Monitor Yen Weakness

Japan’s currency has fallen to a nearly four decade low against the United States dollar, driven largely by the widening interest rate gap between the two economies.

According to Hupzy, an analyst at Spot On Chain, the yen’s decline carries meaningful implications for crypto markets.

Hupzy noted that extended periods of yen weakness have historically encouraged some investors to turn to assets such as Bitcoin and stablecoins as a hedge against declining purchasing power.

The analyst believes that if the Bank of Japan continues to avoid intervention, the current trend could strengthen further.

However, there is also risk on the downside. Any move by Japan’s Ministry of Finance to support the yen could rapidly reverse capital flows and create short term liquidation pressure across risk assets, including crypto.

According to Hupzy, a sharp rebound in the yen following intervention could temporarily weigh on Bitcoin, even though the broader macroeconomic trend driven by currency depreciation remains supportive until interest rate conditions begin to normalize.

These comments came as financial markets responded positively to easing geopolitical tensions. The Nasdaq 100 climbed 2.3% after Donald Trump said the United States and Iran had agreed to halt strikes and return to negotiations.

Bitcoin briefly touched $60,000 during Asian trading hours before pulling back and trading closer to $59,000.

Not all analysts agree that Bitcoin is the best hedge against yen weakness. Peter Schiff argued that gold may provide stronger protection against currency depreciation.

Japan’s Crypto Policy Shift Adds More Attention

The yen’s decline is unfolding at a time when Japan is also making major changes to its crypto regulations.

The country is preparing to shift crypto oversight from the Payment Services Act to the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act.

According to XWIN Japan, a contributor at CryptoQuant, the proposed framework would classify cryptocurrencies as financial products and introduce tighter rules focused on disclosure, market manipulation, and insider trading.

Earlier this month, Japanese lawmakers also approved legislation that could reduce crypto tax rates and eventually open the door for spot crypto ETFs.

For crypto investors, attention is now centered on Japan’s next policy move. If authorities allow the yen to remain weak, Bitcoin may continue attracting defensive capital. However, if intervention occurs, markets could face another wave of short term selling before a clearer direction emerges.#crypto#cryptonews https://coinsignals.net https://t.me/coinsignalpublic

Bitcoin remained volatile over the last 24 hours as bulls continued fighting to reclaim the critical $60,000 level. At the same time, global financial markets responded positively to renewed diplomatic developments between the United States and Iran.

Bitcoin briefly climbed above $60,600 but failed to maintain momentum, falling back toward $59,400. During the session, the asset also dipped below $59,000, highlighting continued selling pressure each time buyers attempt to push prices higher.

Bitcoin Faces Key Resistance at $60K

Bitcoin entered the new week under pressure, slipping below $60,000, a level that has become a major short term battleground for traders.

Although BTC managed a modest rebound, upside momentum remains weak as traders assess several major factors, including macroeconomic uncertainty, geopolitical tensions, and softer crypto market sentiment.

This cautious mood is also reflected in continued ETF outflows. Another $300 million reportedly exited BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust, signaling ongoing pressure from institutional flows.

A major catalyst for market sentiment came from Donald Trump, who stated that peace discussions with Iran could resume. His comments helped ease concerns surrounding geopolitical tensions, although reports remain mixed regarding Tehran’s stance and the timing of possible negotiations.

Traditional markets reacted positively to the news. Major US indexes ended the session higher, with gains seen across the NASDAQ Composite and S&P 500. The Dow Jones Industrial Average also reached a record high as investors rotated back into major technology stocks amid improving sentiment.

Despite stronger performance in equities, Bitcoin has not yet benefited in the same way. BTC remains stuck below $60,000, and a decisive breakout above that level is likely needed to improve short term market confidence.

Failure to reclaim this zone could open the door for another test of support near $59,000.

Altcoins Show Mixed Performance

The broader altcoin market remained relatively stable, with most major assets posting only modest moves.

Ethereum traded near $1,600 after a slight gain. XRP remained flat around $1.04, while Solana moved slightly higher and approached $74 after gaining around 1%.

One of the stronger performers was Hyperliquid, whose native token rose approximately 4.5% to trade near $65.

Overall, the cryptocurrency market remained largely unchanged, with total market capitalization hovering around $2.14 trillion. Trading volumes stayed relatively elevated, while Bitcoin’s market dominance held near 58%.

For now, crypto traders remain cautious. While US equities gained momentum on renewed optimism surrounding diplomacy between the United States and Iran, Bitcoin still needs to reclaim and hold $60,000 as support before a stronger recovery can take shape.#crypto#cryptonews https://coinsignals.net https://t.me/coinsignalpublic

XRP is showing early signs of a possible rebound as network activity and investor sentiment continue to improve despite recent price weakness.

The digital asset has managed to stay above the key $1.00 support level and is currently trading around $1.04. This comes after XRP dropped to a 19 month low near $1.01 on June 25.

Although price action remains under pressure, data from Santiment suggests interest in the XRP Ledger is growing.

Rising Wallet Activity Signals Renewed Interest

According to recent figures, the XRP Ledger recorded 4,941 new wallet creations in a single day, marking its strongest network growth in more than three months.

This increase suggests new participants are entering the ecosystem even as XRP trades near recent lows.

Investor sentiment has also shifted in a more positive direction. Santiment reported that bullish commentary now outweighs bearish sentiment by 3.7 to 1, the strongest positive ratio seen in three months.

This growing optimism indicates that many traders view the $1.00 to $1.05 range as an attractive buying zone, fueling renewed fear of missing out among market participants.

Santiment noted that this confidence is supported by several factors, including XRP’s history of bouncing back after sharp declines, continued discussions surrounding exchange traded funds, and growing expectations for institutional adoption.

Another important factor is whale accumulation, as larger holders appear to have continued buying during the recent downturn. However, Santiment cautioned that it remains unclear whether the spike in wallet creation will translate into sustained buying pressure or if it reflects short term speculation driven by FOMO.

Whale Activity and Institutional Interest Grow

Separate data from CryptoQuant shows that whale activity is becoming increasingly active across centralized exchanges.

However, this activity appears less concentrated on Binance, suggesting large investors are spreading their trades across multiple platforms rather than relying on a single exchange.

Despite XRP’s price struggles, institutional interest remains strong.

Spot XRP exchange traded funds in the United States recorded $15.34 million in net inflows on June 29.

The Bitwise XRP ETF attracted the largest share with $11.94 million in inflows, while Canary Capital’s XRPC fund brought in $3.40 million.

Total inflows for June have now exceeded $62 million, pushing cumulative net inflows across all US spot XRP ETFs to approximately $1.48 billion, according to data from SoSoValue.#crypto#cryptonews https://coinsignals.net https://t.me/coinsignalpublic

The altcoin market continues to face severe pressure, with most alternative cryptocurrencies struggling to recover from extended losses. According to CryptoQuant analyst Darkfost, altcoins have been among the hardest hit assets during the current bear market.

Darkfost reported that 84% of altcoins are currently trading below their 200 day moving average, placing them in what he described as a state of complete underperformance.

He noted that every attempt at recovery has failed, while total altcoin market capitalization excluding Ethereum continues to decline. A weekly close below the 200 day moving average further confirms the ongoing weakness across the sector.

Altcoins Continue to Struggle

This prolonged downturn is not a recent development. Altcoins have been under heavy pressure for the past eight months, marking their second longest period of weakness since 2020.

Darkfost described the current phase as an extended period of stagnation affecting most altcoins, pushing investor confidence to the limit.

Despite the bleak outlook, he highlighted that similar periods have historically created medium term opportunities. However, he stressed that success in the current environment requires far more careful asset selection than in previous market cycles.

The broader crypto market has fallen roughly 51% from its peak, with total market capitalization now sitting around $2.15 trillion.

Major altcoins such as BNB, XRP, and Solana have dropped between 60% and 75% from their all time highs. Smaller altcoins have suffered even steeper declines, with many losing between 80% and 90% of their peak values.

Even so, the top three altcoin season indexes currently range between 48 and 51 out of 100, signaling neutral market conditions rather than a clear altcoin season.

Some analysts remain optimistic. Market analyst Sykodelic maintained a bullish outlook, saying the setup for altcoins is improving.

He acknowledged that recent performance has been painful for investors, but believes market conditions are gradually becoming more constructive.

This optimism is supported by technical indicators. Analysts noted that for the first time in more than two years, the weekly MACD has turned positive. They also pointed to chart patterns suggesting a strong bottom formation, similar to the setup seen during the 2020 market bottom.

Crypto Market Outlook

A small number of altcoins posted modest gains today, including Solana, Hyperliquid, and Zcash. However, most altcoins remain near bear market lows.

Bitcoin briefly climbed back above the important $60,000 level but failed to hold that momentum, slipping below it again during Tuesday’s Asian trading session.

Meanwhile, Ethereum recovered above $1,600 following Bitmine’s latest purchase. However, the move was short lived, with Ether falling back to around $1,590 shortly afterward.#crypto#cryptonews https://coinsignals.net https://t.me/coinsignalpublic

Crypto analyst Merlijn has challenged comments made by Brad Garlinghouse about Strategy, arguing that Ripple and Strategy follow similar funding models.

According to Merlijn, Garlinghouse should not be criticizing Michael Saylor because Ripple also generates funding by selling XRP from escrow on a monthly basis.

As discussions continue around Strategy’s recent Bitcoin activity, Merlijn responded directly to Garlinghouse’s remarks and pointed out what he sees as a contradiction. He argued that both Ripple and Strategy rely on market based funding methods, making Garlinghouse’s criticism difficult to justify.

Recently, Garlinghouse said in an interview with CNBC that Strategy’s Bitcoin model is putting pressure on the crypto market. Strategy had paused its consistent Bitcoin buying streak and sold part of its holdings, a move that caused significant reaction across the market because the company has played a major role in driving Bitcoin demand.

Although Strategy later resumed buying Bitcoin, the sale attracted criticism from several prominent figures in crypto. Garlinghouse argued that Saylor’s approach lacks a sustainable long term strategy built around Bitcoin’s core strengths.

He explained that Strategy’s buying model helped fuel enthusiasm during Bitcoin’s rally, but the same model is now creating additional downside pressure as prices fall.

Garlinghouse also pointed to Strategy’s leveraged acquisition model involving its STRC stock. With the stock trading roughly 25 percent below its $100 par value, he believes the risks of this strategy are becoming more visible during market corrections. In his view, Strategy should prioritize long term value creation and utility instead of relying heavily on financial engineering.

Merlijn acknowledged that Garlinghouse may be correct about STRC facing challenges. However, he maintained that the Ripple CEO has little ground to criticize Saylor because Ripple also depends on selling XRP to fund operations.

He described Strategy and Ripple as two major players using similar market dependent funding models. Since both approaches can create selling pressure on their respective assets, Merlijn sees Garlinghouse’s comments as inconsistent.

He also noted the irony in Garlinghouse criticizing Strategy over a single Bitcoin sale while Ripple regularly sells XRP and does not promote a strict hold forever mindset around the token.#crypto#cryptonews https://coinsignals.net https://t.me/coinsignalpublic

David Schwartz, co founder of the XRP Ledger, has introduced a new proposal aimed at reducing front running on the XRPL decentralized exchange and automated market maker.

The proposal centers on a transaction reservation system designed to give users guaranteed execution priority if they pay a reservation fee before a ledger closes.

Schwartz’s idea came in response to concerns raised by XRPresso.io, which argued that validators and well connected nodes may be able to exploit visibility into pending transactions before validation to gain an advantage over regular traders.

Growing Front Running Concerns on XRPL

According to XRPresso.io, transactions on the XRP Ledger often remain visible in a public queue before a ledger closes.

This allows validators and certain nodes to monitor pending trades and potentially determine whether sandwich attacks or other front running strategies would be profitable.

Because transaction ordering on XRPL follows a known and deterministic process based on transaction hashes, bad actors could submit multiple similar transactions to improve their chances of securing favorable execution positions.

As a result, everyday traders using standard wallets or trading applications could be placed at a disadvantage, while more sophisticated participants extract value from their trades.

Schwartz Responds With Reservation Proposal

Schwartz acknowledged that front running concerns are valid, but challenged parts of the criticism.

He argued that all network participants can view pending transactions equally and said validators do not have an inherent structural advantage unless multiple validators coordinate maliciously.

According to Schwartz, any such collusion would be highly visible on chain and could result in those validators being removed from trusted validator lists.

He also noted that no confirmed cases of real world exploitation have been reported beyond proof of concept demonstrations.

Schwartz added that profitability remains a major challenge for would be attackers.

For front running to be worthwhile, bad actors would need enough liquidity to generate meaningful profits while still operating in conditions where price movement can be influenced at a reasonable cost.

To address the issue, Schwartz proposed a reservation based execution model.

Under this system, a user would first submit a reservation transaction containing a ledger sequence number and transaction ID, along with a reservation fee.

If the reservation is accepted and the actual transaction is submitted before that ledger closes, it would receive guaranteed execution priority over transactions created after the original trade became visible.

This system is intended to protect users from being front run or sandwiched when executing sensitive trades.

The Wider Debate Around DeFi Front Running

XRPresso.io responded by saying Schwartz’s idea is worth exploring, but argued that it introduces added cost and complexity.

The platform also noted that the proposal does not fully solve the core issue, which is the visibility of transaction details before validation.

According to XRPresso, stronger privacy protections around pending transactions may offer a cleaner long term solution.

The front running issue extends far beyond the XRP ecosystem and remains a major challenge across decentralized finance.

Last year, Changpeng Zhao proposed a dark pool perpetuals DEX concept designed to hide order data until execution using zero knowledge cryptography.

That proposal also sparked debate, with some decentralization advocates arguing that hiding order books could recreate insider advantages that crypto was originally built to eliminate.#crypto#cryptonews https://coinsignals.net https://t.me/coinsignalpublic

Nearly one year after Jim Cramer introduced the “PARC” stock basket on CNBC’s Mad Money, three of the four companies in the group have either declined sharply or delivered little growth.

The PARC basket included Palantir, AppLovin, Robinhood, and Coinbase.

At the time, many investors viewed the grouping as a bullish signal for crypto related stocks. However, one year later, Coinbase has emerged as the weakest performer among the four.

Coinbase Becomes PARC’s Biggest Underperformer

Cramer introduced PARC on July 14, 2025, describing the four stocks as market favorites driven heavily by retail enthusiasm and momentum.

He argued at the time that the market had effectively split into two major groups: the S&P 500 and the PARC basket, with the latter benefiting from intense momentum trading.

According to updated performance data shared on June 29, 2026 by market commentator Heisenberg, Coinbase has delivered the worst performance since PARC was created, falling by 62%.

Additional market data shows Coinbase traded between $139 and $444 over the past 52 weeks.

At around $149, the stock is now trading close to the lower end of that range, far below the levels seen when investor confidence was much stronger.

Interestingly, financial disclosures filed in May revealed that Donald Trump purchased Coinbase shares between January and March 2026 through third party financial managers.

Mixed Performance Across PARC Stocks

Palantir has also struggled, declining roughly 25% since PARC was introduced and around 40% in 2026 alone.

The stock previously reached a 52 week high near $207 but is now trading around $113.

Robinhood has remained largely unchanged, making it relatively stable compared to the rest of the basket.

Earlier this month, Robinhood expanded its crypto business into Canada after completing its $180 million acquisition of WonderFi.

The company now serves more than one million funded international customers, though this growth has had limited impact on its stock performance.

AppLovin stands out as the only strong performer in the group.

Since PARC was introduced, AppLovin has gained 34%.

Even so, its current share price of around $477 remains well below its 52 week high of $745.

Among the four companies, AppLovin is clearly the strongest outlier.

From PARC to CRAP

Before settling on PARC in 2025, Cramer reportedly considered another acronym: CARP, which rearranged the same four stocks.

However, market participants created their own version: CRAP.

One year later, some analysts believe that joke acronym ended up reflecting reality more accurately than the original basket.

Market analyst Shanaka Anslem Perera revisited the idea in a recent post, noting that the acronym appeared at the peak of investor enthusiasm.

He argued that what started as a joke ultimately became an accurate reflection of how these momentum driven stocks performed over the following year.#crypto#cryptonews https://coinsignals.net https://t.me/coinsignalpublic